EY2012

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Filip Habram


"The young generation feels that a better world is coming with them.
Old Guard feels the better world is leaving with them."
(Charles Dickens)

Many of you have surely wondered why I have chosen this quote in the beginning. The answer is quite simple.  It's because my expectations that for the first view it is truly serious problem but for the second view I think everyone of us remind itself in one of the group mentioned above. Yes, this quote is pretty close to the reality.

Although this idea was said by Mr. Dickens before more than half a century, it is still current. What's more, it was current hundreds years before too. Generational issues have always been, still are and always will be. The question is, why the young and the old squabble for many millennia.

Remember your youth when you could hear from your parents and grandparents phrases like "When I was young we have done differently." Or "Everything used to be better." Old generations are simply too conservative and unwilling, or perhaps unable to accept new trends. To deal with the new things is the privilege for the youth. Whether we like it or not, for a young man it is much easier to follow the time changes.

In contrast, the young contradict by the words "Today is everything different, you cannot understand." And reject the views and experiences of older generations as something that may have been true once upon a time, but in today's "other times“definitely not. Isn´t there a right for the elderly people to feel left out? In my opinion the problem is in the experience. Old people are simply too experienced so they can not take life easily as the young. On the other hand the young are less experienced to take life seriously. Many young people live only day by day and not bother too much.  

The most alarming finding is the fact that differences between generations will be more and more widespread, which is clearly due to the fast development. Let's look at the curve of the human civilization, we can find rises it more steeply because of the most discoveries has been made ​​in the last few centuries. Therefore the elderly has no chance to keep pace with their children. We can ask ourselves if we will be enough smart to understand the life of our children within few decades.







We asked a few questions to local people in Verona and Cyprus , which we thought could be suitable for our research for the future of the project, see below just 5 answers, which are very interesting:

QUESTION:

"The reason of the generation gap". Is it caused by young or old generation? Give 3 reasons why you see it is caused by the old or young people. – 5 answers were pretty interesting, see below

ANSWERS:

1. It is more a reflection of the way that society changes. Opinions change - for instance the growing acceptance of diversity in response to a rapidly globalizing society has caused us to look at different belief systems with more of an open mind those past generations. Look at the transition from slavery to equality. People believed that slavery and discrimination were okay because they were socialized to believe that. It was the norm. As the norm changed, attitudes changed as well. Similarly, technology has changed. Today, we take the Internet and the ability to communicate instantly with anyone, anywhere for granted. It is the norm for us. For our parents and our grandparents, this was not the case. While today's youth have grown up surrounded by computers, their parents did not. As a result, the younger generation is more comfortable with technology because it has grown along with them. They do not have to learn something new. Therefore, I would argue that it is overall changes in society, from technology to government structure, religion, and belief systems or norms that causes the "gap" to exist, not individuals themselves young or old.

2. Generation gap refers to the differences in ways of thinking and behaving that exists between older people, considered to be from the earlier generation, and the younger people, considered to be from later generations. This often leads to lack of communication and understanding between people of different generations.

These different thinking of the people are shaped by the environment they face and the experiences that they go through. Particularly the impressions formed in the earlier years of the life are more enduring than the ones formed later in life. Thus the impressions and feelings developed by older generation do not change that easily with changing times. At the same time the younger generations that have never been exposed to the environment of faced by the earlier generation are no able to appreciate the impact of such environment. For example, people who lived through the depression learnt to put great importance on material possessions and financial security. Most people who grew up in later periods had no idea of what it is like to have to struggle for money and job. They felt baffled by the great importance put by their parents on material possession and financial security. This resulted in kind of generation gap that developed during 1960's.

From the above discussion it is clear that neither young nor old generation could be held responsible for the generation. It is the changing environment, faced by different generation that causes generation gap. If at all we have to hold one of the two generation responsible, I would choose the older generation, as they have greater power to shape the thinking of their children. The elders could also take special care to educate younger generation on their past and its effect on their thinking.

3. I don't see the generation gap as being necessarily caused by one side or the other. Rather, I think it's a result of how one group perceives reality or consciousness over another. It has to do with a culture that is defined by age and the values that such an age based culture share. The perceptions and understandings that each culture have are not something that automatically makes one to blame over another, but rather is a statement of reality that has to be understood and accepted as part of the condition of being within a multigenerational and heterogeneous setting.

4. I'd argue that the generation gap is caused by both the old and the young. It really is about communication. There is essentially too much miscommunication between the two groups because their culture and experiences are too different for them to understand each other.

5. I would suggest that older people have learned that maintaining a connection between generations is extremely difficult and they have a (wise) tendency to give up on trying to stay connected to the culture of teenagers when they are well past their own teenaged years.


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Friday, June 1, 2012

Dissemintion Activity, Craiova, Romania

Today, the Department of Physical Education belonging to the University of Craiova, hold the Grundtvig National Seminar “Responsibility and Intergenerational Solidarity".

The aim of the seminar was to raise the quality of projects and to assure the exchange of best practices.

Florentina Baciu had the honor to present our project to a large  audience.

She insisted on the products of the project from the first year: project meetings, brochures, posters, web-site and blog, the Rosenberg Test and the questionnaire on the generation gap.
The presentation raised the interest of the participants in the project and in its results .

This  is the 3rd dissemintion activity of Florentina. She  also presented  the project on Europe's Day ( May 9th )  and on the occasion of Maramures Educational Fair ( April).

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Task of the visit in Verona and Venice by Italian group


 GRUNDTVIG Learning Partnerships
Young and Adults for a Better Life

ITALY

CULTURAL AND SOCIAL ENCOUNTER WITH THE INHABITATS OF VERONA AND VENICE

You are kindly requested to come back from your visit to Venice/Verona with the answers to the following questions:
1.       While walking in the streets of the city try to find out the proportion  of the two generations ( young people  and elderly people) represented in the means  of public  transport and other public places ( like bars, restaurants, shops etc.)
In Verona and around Garda Lake we realized that adult people are kinder than the young in helping other people for example in public transport to give up their seat to an old person, but, at contrary inside bars and shops young people are more open mind than older ones.
Senior prefer to stay with their peers, playing with play-cards or reading newspapers, while young people prefer to drink with their friends, avoiding intergenerational contacts



2.       As you are a tourist you can find out whether more young or elderly people work in tourism and try to think over why?

We found out that more young people than elderly ones work in restaurants and bars during weekends, but in tourist offices we came across more elderly people. We think that the reason is at first that the economic crisis affects more young people than senior ones.


3.       Try to find out how many people speak English and whether more young people speak English than to the elderly? Why/
We hadn’t a chance to speak English to Italian people because we’re Italian too; but , in general,  We can meet more young people speaking  English than elderly. Referring to Italian people,  we know that most elderly people studied French at school when they were young. Only in the last decades English language became the compulsory first foreign language studied in Italian schools.





4.       When looking around in the streets of the city can you find signs that Italy belongs to the EU? How? (Flags, slogans, posters)?
In front of public buildings we always saw  3 flags waving: Italian, European and Regional flags. Some posters which  advertised  concerts, environmental activities, archeological excavations and so on, showed  both Italian and European flags.
On some posters that sponsorize the restoration of local monuments you can see European logos




5.       Do you think that the Italians are an optimistic or pessimistic people? What makes you think so?
We think that Italians are pessimistic and optimistic on a fifty-fifty basis . About economy, politics and the future for new generations they are pessimistic, but about familiar values and willingness to  socialize they are absolutely optimistic.


by  Ivo Zambello, Salvatore Filella, Marina Mecarelli - Italy


Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Minutes of the second project meeting, Verona, Italy

Minutes of the 2nd Project Meeting

Participants, 57 people representing the 11 partner institutions:
  1. Info Project SRL  RO- 9
  2. EUROCULTURE CY – 5
  3. Diocesan Caritas ostraviensis– opaviensis CZ- 2
  4. Telek 23 KFT (SITE 23 LTD) HU- 2
  5. Polo Europeo della Conoscenza- IC LORENZI IT-3 people +3 guests
  6. STOWARZYSZENIE NA RZECZ ROZWOJU GMINY ZYCHLIN PL- 4
  7. Junta de Freguesia da Vila de S. Tomé de Negrelos PT- 6
  8. Znanstveno raziskovalno združenje za umetnost, kulturno-izobraževalne programe in tehnologijo EPeKa SL- 9
  9. FONS FORMACIÓ ZONA MEDITERRÀNIA, S.L.L. ES -1
  10. Viksjoforsbaletten  SE- 13  
  11. Upperby Community Development Centre UK-3
    Location: Verona – Italy, Centro Carraro
    Date: 7th-11th March 2012
 The host organization was Polo Europeo della Conoscenza- IC LORENZI represented by Ivo Zambello, Salvatore Filella and Marina Mecarelli.
All participants were accommodated and had most of the meals and activities at Centro Carraro, Verona. That offered the participants the opportunity to spend most  of the  time together  and  organize common  activities from  morning till evening.
The participants formed a group perfect for our project, aged from 18 up to 70.
One of the participants even pointed out that the  words “generation gap” do not  suit  to our  most cosmopolitan group. The atmosphere was  very  friendly  and productive.
 The teams arrived in Verona on the 7th of  March. From the very beginning there  was  much interaction  and people got to know  one  another.
In the  evening the organizers  had a  meeting with the international coordinator related  to the  programme of the meeting discussing all the  details of the reunion.
 The first working session started  on the 8th of March with the welcoming speech and with Europe’s  Anthem. The organizers provided  the English version offering all participants the opportunity  to  sing it  together.
Then the Romanian team offered  the project coordinators  amulets of love and  good luck at the beginning of   spring as it happened in Romania.
As March 8th is the International Women’s Day the gentlemen present congratulated the women participating in the reunion. This  moment  was  further completed  on Saturday  with the  visit  to the  exhibition dedicated  to  this  even open in Verona  Art Museum.
After these festive  moments  the international coordinator  presented the  contents  of the Blog  and  of the Site  of the project
   http://young-and-adults.info-project.ro) together with the  e-group
 intergenerational_solidarity@yahoogroups.com  that contributes  a lot  to fostering the team spirit of the partnership.
We took the decision to create  a new  group  just  for  coordinators  to better manage  the number  of  e-mails. (The new  group has  just been created:
We reviewed the materials  that are  to be  added  to  the site  and we decided  that all project  coordinators  should  contribute  to the  Blog with articles related  to the project.
 We also checked  the data  of the next meetings  and  all agreed  that the data  are OK.
 Before the  presentations  of the surveys the main objectives  of the project  were taken into  account  followed  with a presentation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale pointing out  the reason  for  which it  was  chosen  (validated  all over  the  world).
9 teams managed  to deliver  their presentations in the morning  and  two in the  afternoon. The diversity of the presentations  kept the interest of the participants alive throughout the  whole  day. All teams  proved  to have done a great  job. The satisfaction  of the  good  work  was general.
 In the  afternoon 3 representatives  of the organizations “Tante Tinte”  and “Caritas” presented  to the  audience their voluntary  activities. During the break the participants  continued  the  discuss  with the guests  about the possibility of  future  collaboration.
 In the  evening we had  our  first interactive  workshop  under the guidance  of the Swedish team. It was  a Dance Lesson. All participants, irrespective of  age,  joined  the dance. It was  a most  successful activity which  put a smile  on the faces  of  all the people present.
The teams  exchanged gifts going  from sweets  to national drinks (wine  or palinca).
 The second day of the reunion , March 9th, started  with another interactive  moment: an energizing  exercise. All participants were invited, under  the coordination of a young Swedish  young girl,   to do some gymnastics movements accompanied  by music.
 After  referring  again  to the  tasks  of the project , we pointed  out the educational priorities of the European Union; we mentioned  the necessity of developing the 8 key competences  among which the  entrepreneurship  competences are strongly  emphasized  by our  project by working on raising the self-esteem of the target groups. Even the participation in the  survey contributed  to raising the awareness on this  issue, many of the participants realizing that they  either had  not paid  attention to  it before or had  a quite low self-esteem.
 The participants were then organized in 10 international teams  and were invited  to elaborate a questionnaire on the generation gap. When they finished, each  group chose  a speaker  who presented  the results  of their  work. The questionnaires were  collected  and a common questionnaire  will be  produced by the coordinating team. After  all teams approve it will be used  for a new  survey on the target  group.
 The next activity was a discussion   on  the methods for its  processing  and  analysing pointing  out the fact  that there should  be  elaborated  a common methodology next  time  to  avoid  varied approach  from the part of the teams.
 We also discussed  about the grid  of  a successful project  to be  added at the  brochure  with examples  of  good practice.
 A first oral feedback took place and  all participants expressed  their  satisfaction of  what they have managed  to  do in the  first  two days in the project  praising very much the interactive  activities  that  took place.
The coordinators  elaborated a grid  to be  filled  in by the participants  in which they were supposed  to  work  again in groups  and  fill in  the following  grid:
 CULTURAL AND SOCIAL ENCOUNTER WITH THE INHABITATS OF VERONA AND VENICE
You are kindly requested to come back from your visit to Venice/Verona with the answers to the following questions:
  1. While walking in the streets of the city try to find out the proportion  of the two generations ( young people  and elderly people) represented in the means  of public  transport and other public places ( like bars, restaurants, shops etc.)
  2. As you are a tourist you can find out whether more young or elderly people work in tourism and try to think over why?
  3. Try to find out how many people speak English and whether more young people speak English than to the elderly? Why/
  4. When looking around in the streets of the city can you find signs that Italy belongs to the EU? How? (Flags, slogans, posters)?
  5. Do you think that the Italians are an optimistic or pessimistic people? What makes you think so?
 These visits were meant  to help the participants  cooperate in groups formed  of young  an  elder people to see  how  they can produce common essays on the  topic related  to the population of the  visited places. It was  not only  an exercise of  developing  cultural competences  but  mostly  of  developing civic  and  interpersonal competences in multi aged  groups.
 The first visit was two villages on the board  of Garda Lake, a good opportunity  for  a Group Photo. In these  villages they noticed that  almost all old buildings had been replaced  by new  villas  and  the region turned  into a very important touristic  site. They visited small family shops  in which  young  and  old members  of the family worked  together. The  same thing happened in the vineyards, so famous in Italy. The lake, used in the past  just  for fishing,   for feeding, now it is used   for  fishing as  a hobby and  for nautical sports.
 In the  evening  all participants  were invited  to write  a feedback on the  first two days of the meeting answering the following questions:
 1.    How do you feel about the meeting?
2.    What did you like best?
3.    What memory will you take away with you?
4.    What improvements can you make?
5.    What new things did you learn out of this meeting?”
 The answers were collected  and discussed with the project  coordinators on the last day, during the final evaluation activity.
All  respondents pointed  out  the satisfaction of  having been  together  and  spending a fruitful  time participating in interesting  and attractive activities.
They came  with constructive  suggestions  for  the future meetings  so as  to keep organizing interactive  activities which they enjoyed  very much. Learning by  doing  proved  to be  the most successful  characteristic of this meeting.
 On the last  day the teams divided  in several groups  and were supposed  to fill in the  grid meant to notice  relevant things  connected  to our project issues ( See the grid  above.)
 In the evening, during the final  evaluation activity,  all participants expressed  their satisfaction  and  gratefulness  for the way  the meeting was organized  by the Italian hosts.
The  coordinator pointed  out  that, besides the good  organization, the success  of the meeting was  also due  to the active  involvement and seriousness  of all teams.
 In this atmosphere the Italian team handed  the Participation Certificates  to all the participants.
 The next meeting will be in Cyprus, at the end of  June 2012.
 Mariana Gabriela Hudrea                                                      Verona, March 11th 2012
Project coordinator